Greater Flagstaff Forests Partnership
GFFP
About GFFP
About Our Forest
Restoration
Monitoring
Utilization
Events
Links
 HomeSitemap |Search Our Site | Contact Us

Greater Flagstaff Forests Partnership
Partnership Advisory Board Meeting Agenda
Flagstaff City Hall
(downstairs conference room)
14 May 2002

  1. Introductions

4. Updates

 

2. Approval of Minutes

5. Other Business

 

3. Presentations

6. Adjourn

1. Introductions

Brian Cottam - Greater Flagstaff Forests Partnership, Inc
Jackie Marlette - Greater Flagstaff Forests Partnership, Inc
Emily Lethenstrom- Ecological Restoration Institute
Doc Smith - Ecological Restoration Institute
Bob Arambula - Cocopai RC&D
Gene Waldrip - USFS
Charlie Denton - Ecological Restoration Institute
Dick Fleishman - USFS
Deb Larson - NAU College of Engineering
John Aber - Coconino County Community Development
Kevin Boness - Arizona State Land Department
Tomas Robinson - Arboretum at Flagstaff
Jim Wheeler - City of Flagstaff
Taylor McKinnon Grand Canyon Trust
Kathy Hemenway - NAU
Tom Kolb - Society of American Foresters
Carolyn Hull-Sieg - Rocky Mountain Research Station
Tammy Randall-Parker - USFS
Paul Summerfelt - Flagstaff Fire Department
JJ Smith - NAU School of Forestry
Michael P. Macauley - NRCD, Cattle Growers
Brad Ack - Grand Canyon Trust

Mike Macauley was the chair.

[Top]

2. Approval of April Meeting Minutes

Carolyn suggested that acronyms be defined at least once in the minutes before they are used. Mike requested more comments on the potential access to forest closure. Dick will address that issue today. Dick stated that under the MMT section, the three-fold funding for monitoring for the forest was not yet approved.
Minutes approved
[Top]

3. Presentations

USFS "Flagstaff Center" 5-Year Plan
Gene passed out print information of the plan (proposed projects, available funds, necessary funds, etc). The GFFP plays an important role in the funding and activities of this plan. The priority list of the plan shows GFFP activities as #1. Key points of this plan are that there is not an increase in the total burn areas (except for piles) due to ADEQ (air quality) limits; the FS is at their maximum limits. Second, the inability to sell forest products or to market the products is affecting the community and the full implementation of the plan. The FS project needs exceed the available funding. If only one project sale could occur (as opposed to paying the contractor to do the thinning), the financial problems would be solved and the Center would have enough funding to complete the entire plan (survey, NEPA, implementation, pile burn, broadcast burn, monitor). Third, a complication to the overall plan is that the 2004 work does not reflect the unfinished work from 2003. A decision will need to be made whether the unfinished work in 2003 will be addressed before the 2004 priority #2 items. Otherwise, the incomplete items from any particular year are simply "put on the shelf," due to lack of funding. Another key point was that the fuel money is set and there is not much room for changes. The costs are projected by project and if the treatment changes the budget will change. The budget changes will have national ramifications, as the Flag Center plan is reported to and included in a national USFS plan.

Gene commented that they are dealing with businessmen and they know that the FS will pay for thinning contracts. He mentioned that because there are no funds (if no contracts are actually sold, but instead operators are paid), maintenance burning is given up. Mike asked whether any other funding is available through habitat programs, such as the Rocky Mountain Elk Foundation. Gene said no because the proposed work is mostly fuel reduction. Tammy commented that she and GCFP have tried in the past to get this funding but there was no success. Gene mentioned that the budget was not entered into the national plan past 2004; therefore, there is greater local and national flexibility in 5-year plans beyond the second year of each respective plan. [Top]

Tammy added a correction to the info passed out, to strike the BLM money for 2004.
Gene then showed a detailed wall map of the Flag Center's Five Year Plan projects. He suggested several GFFP boundary changes to better reflect actual project boundaries. These changes encompass expansion to all of the Woody Ridge project area (southwest); including the southern tip of the Kachina Village project; reflect the Mountainaire change, from the original small project to "Big Mountainaire" (south); and eliminate the pinyon-juniper extension on the east side of the map. Dick wondered if the Kachina area could be altered since it is already planned. All agreed that this was simply an alteration of the GFFP's project boundary on the map, and didn't actually affect the KV project as it was planned with this piece. [Top]

Doc motioned the changes; Bob seconded; the boundary changes were approved.
Jim asked why the original Mountainaire project was dropped out. Tammy replied saying that the 2000 small project was incorporated into the 2004 larger FS project. Jim thought that the city was going to provide funding and services to accomplish the original project. Tammy said that the original proposal of using a Categorical Exclusion for this project is no longer going to occur because the project is greater than 10,000 acres. This is the authority that would have utilized City participation, but due to an injunction of CEs during the time the original project was being planned it did not move forward.

Brad said that the problem is not that there is not a market for small diameter wood it is that there is no processing available locally for smallwood. Technology and markets are identified and available, just not here. He said that the government and private sector need to work together, but who in the government will step up and take the lead? He suggested that maybe it can happen at a regional level but that we need public investment for infrastructure. Gene wanted clarification of who needed to step up and what does that mean. Brad said it needs to be someone's job specifically to make it happen. It is not a district ranger thing; it is regional. [Top]

Gene said that the 5-year plan shows why advance planning is so important for the GFFP. The problem is a cycle of having no bids and having to continuously pay. He suggested having no service contracts. Deb said this would cause us to lose the other two loggers left. Tammy followed up to Brad asking about the region's response to the Mater report. Brian said the region supports us but there is a need to take message to new regional forester. The response is positive and supportive but no one is stepping up to the task. Gene said that R. Forsgren is the new regional forester.

Jim said that the 5-year plan is too comprehensive to vote on now but he philosophically understands it. Gene said that 2003 and 2004 is already being implemented in the out year projects. 2004 is important because this summer the NEPA planning work would get done. The order of projects is Kachina Village (2002), Woody Ridge (2003), Mountainaire and then Timberline (2004). He wants approval for 2003 and 2004 because the rest could conceptually change. He is seeking GFFP commitment for the NEPA work for 2004. He said this shouldn't be a problem because all Flag Center priority 1 activities in 2003 regard the GFFP. Kevin said that the only difference is Timberline. Everything else has previously been identified with the GFFP. Doc said it has been discussed at previous MT and PAB as to what would happen next, Timberline or Walnut Canyon. [Top]

Jim motioned approval for 2003 & 2004 Flag Center projects; Doc seconded; all approved and carried.

Kevin followed up saying that we will need to change our out-year plan. Gene said that he would make the new map with boundary alterations and distribute it for our documents. Dick said that CREC could help with Timberline survey work. Ken said that county extension service and Timberline Fire Dept would also be involved.

Brad wants information on GFFP's Woody Ridge project and how work on the Centennial Forest is integrated with the FS. JJ said that the Centennial Forest management plan is not press ready and that the management plan will be broad. Tammy said that the FS had a meeting with the Centennial Forest to begin discussion on the Desired Future Conditions of the entire area and how they could work together to achieve this. They want field tours but don't know the complete integration yet. The FS is going ahead with NEPA this summer. JJ said the Centennial Forest Advisory Committed has seen the management draft and it is ready to give to the State Land Commission. [Top]

Gene said that the 2003 and 2004 budget process is disconnected internally because of the quick deadlines imposed upon local FS staff. He hopes Dick's involvement aids in the planning problems. Dick wants to add the GFFP out year planning to the annul review. This would be the best time for the GFFP to commit to out-year projects. Tom asked if these short-notice planning & budget meetings are activity specific (for acres or type of treatment). Gene responded that they are not. He looks at the available funds then designs projects that come from the EIS direction and input that comes from the public comments.

Deb emphasized that to "break the cycle" we should be cautionary with a decrease in service contracts because there is no market for small diameter. Mike inquired about box factories and if this is being done. Deb said that there is a pallet factory in Phoenix. She wants people to know that there is no small diameter wood market. Gene again said that operators know that they aren't going to buy because we are going to pay them. And they know the exact amount because it is in the publicly available plan. Doc said that to get the regional "big picture" underway we need to get markets. Brad said that there are markets but there is no process facility. That is what we need. Gene said that A1 West might generate money.
[Top]

4. Updates

Kachina Village Project DEIS
Tammy said that the DEIS is about done and June 15 is the expected public release date. The new budget has unit costs (a follow-up from a question asked by Deb at the last meeting). Brad wondered if the FS was on track or ready to answer questions regarding the monitoring of indicator species (MIS). Due to all the recent successful lawsuits, he feels that something should be done soon by the FS. Gene said that the Coconino has met all MIS requirement according to the Forest Plan and that any more analysis (such as the suggested population monitoring of MIS) was not feasible because there was no staff or funding for this activity. Tammy said the MIS analysis was sent for regional review.

Greater Flagstaff Forests Partnership, Inc. (restructure)
Brian said this is well underway. The new board will meet 5-15 (meeting is open to the public) and that a formal letter will be sent out today to the PAB announcing the changes from the previous board's meeting on April 30. The name has been formalized and is now being used, and he passed an agenda out for the upcoming board meeting. Brian and Dick will update the cooperative agreement with the FS. Brad asked if the website is being changed. Brian said yes, and that the PIT is actively addressing this and other public outreach components of the change.

Accomplishments Document/Urban Interface Map
Dick has the map; some FS and A1 polygons are missing. It is coming along well. When it is completed he will try to make it at a scale that is accessible to put it on the web. This will probably happen within the next few weeks. He is thinking of making it 8 1/2 x 11 or displaying the map by quad. Brian said that the Accomplishments Document will also happen soon. Dick is working on it and it is in tabular format.

Fort Valley Ecosystem Restoration Project
Brian said that not much has changed. Unit 28, where Wes has been for some time, is still being worked on. There are still 5-10 acres left because of red-flag restrictions over the past month. It is bound to slow down more as the Kaibab and Coconino are on hoot-owl restrictions. Jim asked how the handling and delivering to the market is going. Brian said this is actually the major slowdown as the couple of remaining markets for Ft Valley wood are no longer taking much. The pallet mill is full and that has been a primary market for Perkins. Jim asked about the chainsaw restrictions. Dick said that heavy work could occur until noon and hauling until 2:00pm. Doc asked what the chance or cost to do a pallet mill here would be. Brad said that we could do a small diameter mill here. Deb said that there is no processing now because the supply is a concern and pallet mills are low-value.

Arboretum Project
Brian said it is completed and signed off. Tomas said that the Arboretum is concerned about invasive weeds colonizing the area. He asked if research is being done on this issue, and if piles will be burned. Brian said that the piles are going to be burned. Doc answered that research is being done on invasives. Jim said that the science is here and that the forest fuel reduction priority has been positively addressed with this project. Mike suggested having sheep graze from Motorola to control invasives. The FS has used that method before. Taylor and Brad commented that the protocol has been studied with machine use. Taylor wants to monitor any efforts that occur. Doc has seen noxious weeds fade out as native species and fires return to an area. He said that from empirical evidence, healthy understory out-competes noxious weeds. His worry is if they do insufficient treatments the noxious weeds will have an advantage. He said that this is not proven but it is a concern. Tom said we should look at Julie Korb's thesis defense about invasive weeds and that Will Moore and Julie Crawford have papers on this topic.

PIT
Brian said that the team's current focus is on the independence transition (website, press release, etc.) and planning the Kachina Village project public outreach. The minutes from the last meeting have been sent out and the next meeting is within a month. The next meeting will be when Ken Fredericks knows the KV s

© 1998 Greater Flagstaff Forest Partnership
Site Designed & Maintained By indigo8
tml>